Ask any agency what to use for your website and 80% will say WordPress without thinking. Ask a modern developer and they'll say Next.js. Neither will explain the why honestly. I will.
What each one is, in real terms
WordPress is a CMS born in 2003 to manage blogs. Today it powers 43% of the internet. The problem is that number includes abandoned, hacked, slow sites maintained with five-year-old templates. Not a medal.
Next.js is a React framework created in 2016 by Vercel. Born for modern web apps: fast, secure, with SSR and static generation. No admin panel by default — it's code, not clicks.
Performance: the real difference
A well-built Next.js site loads in under 1 second. WordPress depends on how many plugins you have, what hosting, whether cache is set up right, whether the theme is optimised... With WordPress, Lighthouse 95+ is a project; with Next.js, it's the starting point.
The Core Web Vitals Google uses for ranking have a direct correlation with technology. It's not that WordPress can't reach green — it can, with work. But Next.js gets there by design.
SEO: the myth that "WordPress is better for SEO"
This is false and repeated constantly. WordPress has Yoast or RankMath, which are solid SEO tools. But the underlying technical SEO — clean URLs, sitemap, hreflang, correct metadata — works just as well in Next.js. And the speed metrics that affect ranking, better.
Where WordPress has an advantage in SEO: it's easier for someone without technical knowledge to upload content, update the blog and manage text. If your content strategy is run by a non-technical team member, WordPress makes that flow easier.
Real cost of each
WordPress: - Decent hosting: €10–30/month (the cheap €2 option causes problems) - Premium theme: €60–80 (one-off, but needs renewal) - Essential plugins: contact form, SEO, security, cache — easily €150–300/year - Updates that break things: every 3–6 months something breaks - Emergency developer when something fails: €50–150/hour
Next.js: - Hosting on Vercel: free up to a point, then €20/month - Domain: €10–15/year - Maintenance: minimal, no plugins to update - Higher upfront cost (custom development)
Long-term, Next.js works out cheaper when you add everything up. Short-term, WordPress is more economical if you're confident managing it yourself.
When WordPress makes sense
It makes sense when you need a powerful CMS to manage content without depending on a developer. An online magazine, a WooCommerce e-commerce, a business directory — WordPress shines there. Also if you know it well, have a trusted developer and don't want to switch tools.
It doesn't make sense for a corporate or service website where content rarely changes. There you pay the CMS price without using its advantages.
When Next.js makes sense
For most local business websites, clinics, professionals, service companies. Projects where speed, technical SEO, multi-language and security matter. If the site will be fairly static — home, services, pricing, contact — Next.js ages better.
Also for projects with serious multi-language needs. With next-intl, hreflang, per-language URLs and per-locale metadata are set up cleanly from the start. With WordPress you need plugins that sometimes fight each other.
My honest take
I use Next.js for all my clients. Not because it's fashionable, but because what they ask for — speed, ranking, multi-language, custom design — it resolves better. The sites I deliver have Lighthouse 95+ out of the box, without fighting plugins or a theme that auto-updates itself on a Tuesday.
If someone asks me for an e-commerce with 500 products and a marketing team uploading content daily, I'll discuss it. Maybe WordPress or Shopify makes more sense there. But for a doctor's site, a workshop, a consultancy or a clinic, Next.js wins without argument.
Frequently asked questions
Is WordPress enough for a small business website?
Depends. For a business that will manage a lot of content themselves (active blog, product catalogue, non-technical team), WordPress can make sense. For a service website where content rarely changes, WordPress adds complexity and costs with no real advantage.
Can SEO be done just as well in Next.js as in WordPress?
Yes. Technical SEO — hreflang, sitemaps, per-page metadata, clean URLs — is implemented perfectly in Next.js. The difference is that in WordPress you need plugins for that; in Next.js it's built in. And the speed Google uses as a ranking factor is better in Next.js.
Why don't you use WordPress if it has more market share?
Market share isn't the same as best technical option. The 43% of the internet on WordPress includes abandoned blogs, hacked shops and sites that load in 8 seconds. For new business projects where speed and technical SEO are priorities, Next.js is objectively superior.
Want a website like this for your business?
Book a free consultation